• Is Mac Now Cruelty Free
• Is Mac Cruelty Free 2018

Based on all the facts above, MAC Cosmetics is NOT CRUELTY FREE. Their products are sold in mainland China and can be subjected to animal testing required by law. You can follow us on Instagram, Pinterest, Facebook, Blog Lovin’, LIKEtoKNOW.it or Subscribe to the website for a weekly Newsletter. WORKING TOWARD A CRUELTY-FREE WORLD. MAC does not test on animals. We do not own any animal testing facilities and we never ask others to test on animals for us. While some governments conduct animal testing to prove safety before they will allow us to sell our products, MAC has never tested on animals and we continue to be a leader in.

Who has not heard of MAC Cosmetics?

Pretty sure everyone has heard of it. And why would they not? I personally have grown up watching my mother use MAC products. And that means that MAC has been here for a while.

Considering how widely popular it is, you would expect MAC to be more on the affordable side. Since it is not, and yet it has such a huge consumer base, tells you a lot about its quality.

But quality and popularity are not all that matters. What about MAC’s ethical stance? Is MAC cruelty-free and vegan in 2021? That is the important question.

Is it not time you found about it? so, keep reading!

Is MAC Cruelty-Free?

No. MAC Cosmetics is not a cruelty-free brand. It is because they chose to profit off markets that conduct animal testing. That means MAC allows its products to be tested on animals if it is required by the local law.

We all know what that means. It is difficult to call MAC Cosmetics cruelty-free. Because it allows its products to be tested on animals under certain circumstances. And we also know that it is not that hard to avoid animal testing as many brands are cruelty-free.

About MAC

MAC, an acronym for Make-Up Art Cosmetics, was founded in Toronto, Canada in 1984. The founders were Frank Angelo and Frank Toskan. There is a fun story behind MAC’s inception. Makeup artist Angelo and Toskan were both frustrated seeing how bad the makeup on models looked in pictures.

The duo then literally created MAC Cosmetics products in their kitchens! Initially, the products were targeted towards professionals in the makeup industry. However, for years now, MAC Cosmetics has been available to consumers worldwide.

MAC Cosmetics mainly stole the show with its base products. But with time, it expanded its product lines and developed and improved existing ones. Within a decade, MAC had started a revolution in the beauty industry that we are still in awe of.

Currently, MAC Cosmetics is a brand recognized and loved globally. It is a giant in the global beauty network. Although founded in Canada, it now has its headquarters in New York, United States.

Is MAC Owned by a Parent Company?

Yes. MAC Cosmetics is owned by Estee Lauder Companies. Estee Lauder Companies gained rights to 51 percent of MAC’s shares in 1994. But it completed the acquisition in 1998.

Estee Lauder Companies is a great entity in the beauty industry as well. Besides MAC Cosmetics, it owns a lot of other brands, including Tom Ford, Smashbox, La Mer, Jo Malone London, etc.

Testing Policy: Does MAC Test on Animals?

MAC Cosmetics personally does not conduct any animal testing. However, they do allow third parties to conduct animal testing on their products. This is only applicable in the cases where the law of the local market requires so.

This means, that we cannot say MAC is not cruelty-free just because it claims not to test on animals. It is aware that at some places where it sells, animal testing is done on its products.

Does MAC Sell in China?

Yes! MAC Cosmetics sells in China. In fact, Mac Cosmetics is quite popular in Mainland China.

MAC says that it does not want to exclude any of its consumers, as you can say. But we cannot ignore that it is being done at the cost of innocent animals being harmed.

Is MAC Certified by PETA?

No! MAC Cosmetics is not certified by PETA. Nor is it certified by Leaping Bunny or other organizations that believe in the same cause. Look up MAC on PETA’s website. You will see that PETA categorizes it as a brand that tests on animals.

In fact, PETA speaks up quite often about MAC’s business in China. It addresses MAC Cosmetics as a brand that is not cruelty-free at all.

Is MAC Vegan?

No. MAC Cosmetics is not 100 percent vegan. That means that most of its products contain ingredients derived from animals or animal by-products. Carmine and beeswax are two of the common ingredients found in most of its products.

This means that as a vegan, you ought to be careful while buying MAC products. Some of their vegan products are:

• MAC Pro Lash Mascara
• Brow Finisher (Certain Colors)
• Synthetic Makeup Brushes
• Brow Pencils (Certain Colors)

Is MAC Gluten-Free?

No. MAC Cosmetics is not gluten-free. The brand addresses the fact that regardless of a product not containing gluten, the products cannot be claimed to be gluten-free. This is because the manufacturing process may not always be in a gluten-free environment.

It is always wise to reach out to the brand to know more, if you are allergic!

Is MAC Paraben-Free?

Nope! MAC is not completely free of parabens! That means that many of its products contain parabens.

This is why I would suggest one to carefully check the label while making a purchase!

Is MAC Hypoallergenic?

No. The brand is not entirely hypoallergenic.

By that, I mean you will find some hypoallergenic products offered by MAC. But not all of their products are hypoallergenic.

Alternative Brands to MAC

I know that finding alternatives to MAC Cosmetics can seem difficult. But it is not impossible!

I have already found a few alternatives that you should definitely check out!

• RMS Beauty: This brand is an ethical alternative to MAC Cosmetics. It is cruelty-free as well as vegan. Moreover, its products are in the same price range as those of MAC! If you love organic makeup products, you would be a fan of this brand on the first try!
• Anastasia Beverly Hills: This brands’ products are amazing enough to give MAC Cosmetics a run for its money! ABH is an extremely popular brand for all the right reasons. Additionally, you will find great vegan options too in this brand.

Fact Check

Let us now do the final fact check!

MAC Cosmetics is:

• Not cruelty-free.
• It allows animal testing when the law requires it.
• MAC is owned by Estee Lauder Companies.
• This brand sells in China.
• Most of its products are not vegan.
• It is not completely free of parabens or gluten.
• Some of its products are hypoallergenic.

Conclusion

Hope you enjoyed this article! It is really heartbreaking to find out that MAC is not cruelty-free. But as I keep saying, it is not very hard to find ethical options! You just need to be open to alternatives!

I am Farhin Raisa, looking forward to creating a community that supports ethical, cruelty-free, and vegan beauty. As I review and find brands that make this community a better one, I hope to aid your process of picking the best products for yourself!

Today’s post is the last in my mini series for International Justice Mission’s Lent campaign. I won’t lie, it’s been mentally tough to write about so much slavery in such a short period of time. That being said, it has also served as a consistent reminder of how unknown these things are, and how important it is to talk about them. Often times when these issues are reported on we end up left feeling helpless, like there’s nothing we can do or change but this is just the reality we live in. I hope my posts have felt different, as I’ve worked to include action points in each one. It’s tough to face the realities of so much injustice worldwide, but it’s also our responsibility to try and be better. So today, after talking ethical coffee and slavery free chocolate, it’s time to turn my attention to make up.

When we talk about make up ingredients we’re often thinking natural, non toxic, cruelty free and potentially palm oil free. But there are other ingredients to consider, the main one being a material called mica.

What is mica

Mica is a family of minerals from the silicate class, the most common minerals found on earth. It comes in different colours, but essentially looks like a very shiny type of rock (it can often be used as fools gold). It’s very likely you’ve seen mica multiple times before, as it’s well sought after for its ability to make things glitter. Humans have used mica to make paint sparkle for centuries, but nowadays it’s especially common in cosmetics. If products such as your eye shadow, lip stick or blusher have some shimmer to them, they probably contain mica.

Where does it come from?

While mica can be found across the world India holds a strong monopoly, making up 60% of global mica production. More specifically, the states of Jharkhand and Bihar in Eastern India account for roughly 25% of the global mica production, but both of these regions are rife with poverty. According to research published in 2013, 36.9% of the population in Jharkand and 33.7% in Bihar live below the poverty line, which means that slavery can easily enter the supply chain. Children become vulnerable as poverty drives them to seek work so that they support their family, whilst quarry owners also use high interest rate loans and violence to enslave families for generations. Child labour is especially pervasive in India’s mica mining business and a huge amount of India’s mica production is unregulated, with the country ‘officially’ producing around 15,000 tonnes of crude and scrap mica a year but exporting 130,000 tones in 2011-2012.

What mica mining looks like

Is Mac Now Cruelty Free

‘Up to 20,000 children are estimated to work in the mines, around 90% of which are illegal, according to a recent report by NGOs Terre des Hommes and SOMO.’ (source)

Which brands are involved

According to research centre DanWatch, twelve out of sixteen international cosmetic companies don’t disclose where their mica comes from, but seven of them support standards that include combating child labour according to their official communication. The problem, as always, seems to come because mica is often sold to middle men who do business with these larger companies. This gives cosmetics companies the ability to not be directly in contact with any child labour or slavery, in the hopes that no one will notice or that they can say they had no idea if people do. Brands that have been linked to India’s mica mines include Estée Lauder, MAC, Rimmel, Bobbi Brown, Clinique, Toofaced, Schwartzkopf, Intercos, Sun Chemicals, Tesco, Asda, BMW, Vauxhall and Audi (as mica is also used to make glittery car paint). However one of the most notable is the world’s second largest cosmetics company: L’Oréal.

Is Mac Cruelty Free 2018

L’Oréal, who owns Maybelline, Lancôme, Garnier, Yves Saint Laurent Beauty, Kiehls, Urban Decay (a very well known cruelty free brand) and more, buys mica through intermediaries such as the German company Merck and the Chinese company Kuncai. These companies are known as the biggest buyers in the area (and supply to the other companies listed above), and regularly source unethical mica:

‘Merck confirm in the article that they were aware of the use of child labour despite contractual obligations from suppliers not to employ children. The company said that further monitoring along the supply chain was very difficult, adding, “especially since these areas are considered not safe.”

Joanna Ewart-James, Anti-Slavery International’s Supply Chain Co-ordinator, said: “It is disappointing that Merck knew about the existence of child labour but appears to have done little to address it. This case demonstrates that contractual requirements not to use forced or child labour are insufficient and offer no guarantee that neither exist in a company’s supply chain.”’ (source)

Whilst Merck has made some vague acknowledgements of the problem, Kuncai simply does not require its supply chain to be child labour free. (source)

“We had no idea just how difficult that would be,” says Stephanie Boyd, the company’s PR manager. “As a direct ingredient it would be easy to identify, but unfortunately mica remains as part of a complex mix of materials that are used to make colour pigments and lustres.” (source)

What’s being done

There are a few different approaches that are being implemented, however none of them are currently perfect.

• India legalises mica mining
  The legalising of mica mining aims to allow the sector to be properly regulated, including eradicating child labour and providing better wages and working conditions for employees. Last May Reuters reported on the beginning of the process, with authorities planning to first sell off dumps of scrap mica and then auctioning old mica mines and other reserves. While activists praised the move, it’s not enough to fully remove child labour, due to high levels of poverty:
  ‘“It’s a positive move, but just making illegal mines legal won’t automatically eliminate child labour, child deaths or debt bondage,” said Peter Bengtsen, who investigated mica’s supply chains for the 2015 mica DanWatch report. “Mica-mining families are poor, and either cannot afford to send their children to school or don’t see the benefit, so children will continue working for extremely low payments.”’ (source)
  It seems the responsibility here now lies with the Indian government to ensure policy is implemented properly, that mines run their operations ethically (including eliminating debt bondage), and that families are paid enough to send their children to school.
• Auditing
  Social auditing and consistent checks from external bodies, like in all areas of manufacturing, aims to keep companies accountable and makes sure they’re doing as they promise. Recently Merck has undertaken steps, employing Environmental Resource Management to carry out monthly assessments of its mines. However, this doesn’t convince everyone.
  ‘”Audits take individual samples of working conditions and often miss bigger issues,” he says. “There’s also the problem that evidence of child labour is frequently hidden during these audits, as these processes are open to corruption. And, since audits are not designed to look for specific problems – as an investigation would – they are arguably engineered to ignore them.”‘ (source)
• Child Friendly Villages
  Established in 2010, child friendly villages is a joint initiative between the National Resources Stewardship Council, (described as ‘a collective of leaders in the beauty industry committed to developing and implementing responsible corporate practices‘) and Indian NGO Bachpan Bachao Andolan (BBA). Through working with local communities and governments the initiative aims to get children in 500 villages into school instead of mining through improving educational infrastructure and living conditions, with the long terms goal of handing over responsibility to communities and government. As of 2016, it was reported that 100 of the 500 villages had been converted, leading to 3650 children being enrolled in school, new schools constructed and existing schools improved with additions such as clean water, and a summit was held in the same year to commit to scale up the model to the remaining 400 villages. Again, this initiative has its shortcomings:
  ‘“The lack of clear targets, a well-defined timeframe and a proper control mechanism are reasons to worry,” says Rob Harrison, editor of Ethical Consumer magazine. “In 10 years, child labour has been far from eradicated. It took a year just to prepare the summit.” What’s more, not everyone is convinced of the ability of such schemes to tackle the problem. Rishi Sher Singh, summit participant and director of ASRD, a sustainable business consultancy says that while basic education is essential, “if children don’t learn how to make a living in other ways, they will go back to mining once school is over”’ (source)

So what can we do?

Make up is a little different to eradicating slavery in chocolate or coffee, because there isn’t a fairtrade or direct trade movement around mica that people can easily switch to. Here are some other options:

• It’s better not to boycott
  Whilst consumers can pressure cosmetic firms to use exploitation free mica it’s a very similar situation to chocolate in Western Africa in that it can drive prices down and create even worse working conditions. Instead, it’s better to pressure businesses to be transparent in their supply chains and invest socially in its Indian mica suppliers, improving the labour conditions and wages for workers, as well as ensuring that Indian workers and mines are still operating.
  ‘“If adults earn fair wages and are able to work under decent conditions – safe and healthy – then they will have the ability to improve their lives and send their children to school instead of taking them to the mines”…“Sometimes foreign companies buy sites, import their own people, build their own villages and the majority of the money made will flow out of the country. In such a situation, the local community can at best profit from new infrastructure. However, if the buying party is obliged to invest socially in return, then the local community can [also] profit from the legalisation.”’ (source)
• Pressure the government on responsible sourcing
  A large part of the problem is companies who rake in the profits abdicating from the responsibility of their sourcing. Whilst the make up industry turns a blind eye, so do other companies using mica such as paint manufacturers and the automobile industry.
  ‘If the UK government included compulsory reporting of forced labour as part of its anti-slavery legislation. That way, it could also make companies responsible for labour abuses in their supply chains in the same way they have through similar reforms to corporate bribery.”‘ (source)
  Essentially, as well as mounting consumer pressure, if we can pressure our governments to make the eradication of slavery a legal requirement as part of a company operations, then hopefully these businesses will take note and use their extensive funds to take real, tangible steps to removing bonded labour from the creation of their products.
• Policy implementation in India
  While India has started to make steps, it’s up to national and local government to make sure correct legislation is enforced. Responsibility has to be a joint effort between governments and corporations, and I believe that donating to IJM is one of the best ways to make that happen. IJM has a long history of working with corporations and local governments to identify ways to eradicate slavery from supply chains at source, as their teams are made up of a variety of people with extensive legal and social knowledge, so funding their work is a great way to get resources into the hands of experts that can really make a difference.

This is a harder one to talk about, because the solutions aren’t as simple as a product switch. In the meantime you could avoid buying any make up that glitters, but again it can be hard to tell because mica can be used in the creation of pigments, which is frustrating. I often say in interviews that I believe real change has to be found through a combination of consumer choice, collective action and policy change. I believe this is one of these instances. It can feel frustrating that there isn’t a simple, clear cut answer, I know. In this case, I believe that putting your resources into organisations like IJM is the best way to root out the problem, alongside pressuring governments and companies to be better. I know it can feel exhausting, but education is the first step to making change happen. So don’t despair, and spread the word.